Served as arbitrator in 8-10 cases in domestic arbitrations
RAC Rules
Rules of the Arbitration Center at RSPP
Examples of cases
1) Sole arbitrator in a dispute arising out of a design works contract, under the RAC Rules and Russian substantive law (redacted award published on the RAC website: https://files.modernarbitration.ru/019483a5-4c56-49a8-9105-954b5a2e1091/Award_25.06.2024_Ushakov.pdf)
2) Sole arbitrator in a dispute arising out of a mixed contract (works, services and assignment of intellectual property rights), under the RAC Rules and Russian substantive law. The dispute was complicated by parallel proceedings under the same contract before the RAC and the state courts.
3) Co-arbitrator in a dispute arising out of a supply contract, under the RAC Rules and Russian substantive law (amount in dispute over RUB 100 million)
4) Sole arbitrator in a dispute arising out of a services contract, under the Rules of the Arbitration Centre at the RSPP and Russian law. The case involves a dispute as to its arbitrability.
5) Presiding arbitrator in a dispute arising out of a construction contract, under the RAC Rules and Russian substantive law
6) Party-appointed co-arbitrator in a dispute challenging a unilateral termination of an R&D contract, under Russian substantive law, the RAC Rules and the Rules of the Specialized Division for Disputes in Nuclear Field (amount in dispute over RUB 700 million)
Yes
Yes
Experience as counsel
Acted as counsel for 11-15 years in domestic and international arbitrations
ICAC Rules
LCIA Rules
SCC Rules
UNCITRAL Rules
ICSID Convention
Examples of cases
1) Representing the Russian Federation in investment arbitration under the UNCITRAL Rules (seated in Madrid) in an amount of over 14.5 billion USD;
2) Representing one of the leading Russian companies in international commercial arbitration (LCIA, London) in a multi-billion USD dispute in connection with the financing of a major infrastructure project;
3) Representing a large metallurgical holding in disputes with a foreign supplier in the Russian ICAC in connection with the foreign supplier’s refusal to supply products to Russia;
4) Representing a CIS general contractor in proceedings under the SCC rules (seated in Stockholm) against the sovereign state and a state concern. The dispute concerned the construction of a mining and processing plant under a contract worth 1 billion USD;
5) Representing the operator of a Central Asian potash plant in a series of cross-border disputes (including in the Russian ICAC) with a Russian contractor relating to a construction project costing over 100 million USD
