Grishchenkova Anna

KIAP, Attorneys at Law

ag@intarb.com

Download CV

General information

Citizenship:

Russian Federation

City:

Moscow

Languages:

Russian - fluent

English - fluent

Career

2015 - 2022

KIAP, Attorneys at Law , Moscow

Partner

Qualified to practice law in:

Russia

Experience as arbitrator

Served as arbitrator in more than 10 cases in domestic and international arbitrations

Arbitration Rules:

ICAC Rules

RAC Rules

Rules of the Arbitration Center at RSPP

LCIA Rules

IAC (Belarus)

Examples of cases

Chairman in a case of recovery of liquidated damages in amount of 3 mln USD, ICAC, English law, Moscow. Party appointed arbitrator in a financial dispute in amount of 100 mln USD, LCIA, English law, London. Party appointed arbitrator in a sanctions-related dispute in amount of 1,7 mln USD, RSPP, Russian law, American law, Moscow. Party appointed arbitrator in a case termination of the contract, recovery of damages in amount of 2 mln USD, ICAC at the RF CCI, CISG, Polish law, Moscow. Party appointed arbitrator in a sanctions related dispute on recovery of penalty in amount of 5 mln USD, ICAC at the RF CCI, Russian law, Moscow. Party appointed arbitrator in a dispute for challenge of transaction (amount in dispute around 2 mln USD), IAC at the Belarus CCI, Belarus law, Minsk.

Sat as sole arbitrator:

Yes

Sat as chair:

Yes

Experience as counsel

Acted as counsel more than 15 years in domestic and international arbitrations

Arbitration Rules:

ICAC Rules

RAC Rules

LCIA Rules

ICC Rules

SCC Rules

VIAC Rules

UNCITRAL Rules

IAC (Belarus); Swiss Arbitration Centre

Examples of cases

Representation in construction dispute in amount of 100 mln USD under Belorussian law in ICC. Representation in financial dispute in amount of 3 mln USD under English law in LCIA. Representation in a dispute arising out of delivery of equipment in VIAC (amount in dispute around 0,5 mln USD); CISG, Italian law. Representation in a construction dispute in amount of 2 mln USD in IAC at the Belarus CCI (Belorussian law) Representation in ad hoc arbitration under German law, amount in dispute around 1 mln USD

In 2 or more cases had direct responsibility for instructing and liaison with

quantum (damages) experts

construction experts

experts on applicable law; experts on quality of goods

General arbitration experience

Has been involved as arbitrator in arbitration seated in:

Moscow

London

Minsk

Has been involved as counsel in arbitration seated in:

Moscow

London

Paris

Stockholm

Geneva and/or Zurich

Hamburg

Has been involved in arbitrations where the applicable substantive law was:

Russian law

Belarussian law

English law

Ukrainian law

German law

Swedish law

Swiss law

Has been involved as arbitrator in:

сonstruction arbitrations

commercial arbitration

Has been involved as counsel in:

сonstruction arbitrations

commercial arbitration

Arbitration specific trainings/qualifications:

CIArb – MCIArb or FCIArb or Chartered Arbitrator

ICC Advanced Arbitration Academy

Listed as arbitrator with the following institutions:

ICAC, RAC, RSPP, VIAC, HKIAC, SIAC, AIAC

Education, qualifications, awards

Professional education:

Pericles, LL.M in American business law, 2011

Tula State University, lawyer, 2004

Additional education qualifications:

Qualification as auditor, 2007

Awards and ratings:

Chambers, Legal500

Positions (current and former) in arbitration community bodies / working groups / as law professor

HK 45, Deputy chairman in ICC Russia Arbitration commission, member of the board of the Russian arbitration center in 2017-2023

Preferences as an arbitrator

Pre-appointment interview

available

Conflicts of interest: scope of disclosure

IBA guidelines

Written submissions style

depends on specifics of the case

Production of documents (general approach):

depends on specifics of the case

Written submissions and bundles:

no general preference

Allocation of time during an oral hearing:

depends on specifics of the case

Using PowerPoint in oral presentations:

no general preference

Party's right to present its case

Maximum deference to the right to present the party’s case

Rigorous control of the process by the tribunal

To what extent should arbitrators raise issues that have not been directly addressed by the relevant party but have been identified by the arbitrators

in general arbitrators should not raise such questions, unless without clarifying such questions it is impossible to rule

Approach to encouraging parties to amicably resolving dispute

in general arbitrators should not force the parties to settle, but it is appropriate to remind the parties about such possibility and sometimes even reserve time for settlement discussions