Samoylov Mikhail

Moscow Industrial Bank JSC

mikhail.samoylov@icloud.com

General information

Citizenship:

Russian Federation

City:

Moscow

Languages:

Russian - fluent

English - sufficiently fluent in order to handle proceedings and render an award

Career

2020 - 2021

Moscow Industrial Bank JSC , Moscow

Head of Litigation Department

2019 - 2020

Mansors , Moscow

Of Counsel

2016 - 2019

Egorov Puginsky Afanasiev & Partners (EPAM) , Moscow

Associate

Qualified to practice law in:

Russia

Experience as counsel

Acted as counsel for 5-10 years in international arbitrations

Arbitration Rules:

ICAC Rules

ICC Rules

ICSID Additional Facility

Examples of cases

GRAND EXPRESS Non-Public Joint Stock Company v. Republic of Belarus (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/18/1).

In 2 or more cases had direct responsibility for instructing and liaison with

experts on foreign law

General arbitration experience

Has been involved as counsel in arbitration seated in:

Geneva and/or Zurich

Has been involved in arbitrations where the applicable substantive law was:

Russian law

English law

bilateral investment treaty

Has been involved as counsel in:

investment arbitration

commercial arbitration

Dispute resolution by dispute boards:

Has been involved in dispute resolution as counsel

Arbitration specific trainings/qualifications:

CIArb – MCIArb or FCIArb or Chartered Arbitrator

Master in International Dispute Settlement (MIDS), Geneva, 2016

Listed as arbitrator with the following institutions:

Tashkent International Arbitration Centre (TIAC)

Education, qualifications, awards

Professional education:

Russian Academy of Advocacy, Law degree, 2007

Preferences as an arbitrator

Conflicts of interest: scope of disclosure

I do not apply any specific guidelines

Written submissions style

no general preference

Production of documents (general approach):

no general preference

Written submissions and bundles:

no general preference

Allocation of time during an oral hearing:

no general preference

Using PowerPoint in oral presentations:

no general preference

Party's right to present its case

Maximum deference to the right to present the party’s case

Rigorous control of the process by the tribunal

To what extent should arbitrators raise issues that have not been directly addressed by the relevant party but have been identified by the arbitrators

Only if it is a legal issue the arbitrators may wish to have submissions on

Approach to encouraging parties to amicably resolving dispute

It is only for parties to decide and arbitrators should focus on resolution of the dispute