Bayandin Dmitry

Secretary to a sole arbitrator in an ICC arbitration seated in Geneva (Switzerland) between a U.S. company and a Spanish company regarding performance of several long-term supply agreements in the metals production industry. Applicable law is Spanish law, the applicable arbitration rules are the 2017 ICC Rules of Arbitration, and the amount in dispute is circa USD 10 million; Assistant to the president of an arbitral tribunal (without an official "secretary" title on the record) in the ICSID Case No. ARB/17/36 regarding an investment in the real estate sector. Applicable law is the United States-Armenia BIT, the applicable arbitration rules are the ICSID Arbitration Rules and the ICSID Convention, the amount in dispute is circa USD 10 million; Assistant to the president of an arbitral tribunal (without an official "secretary" title on the record) in an ICC arbitration seated in Paris (France) between a Polish company and a Polish branch of a French company regarding performance of construction works in an office building. Applicable law is Polish law, the applicable arbitration rules are the 2017 ICC Rules of Arbitration, and the amount in dispute is circa EUR 18 million; Assistant to the president of an arbitral tribunal (without an official "secretary" title on the record) in an ICC arbitration seated in Paris (France) between a Russian company and a Spanish company regarding performance of a satellite launch services agreement. Applicable law is the Swedish law, the applicable arbitration rules are the 2012 ICC Rules of Arbitration, and the amount in dispute is circa EUR 15 million; Assistant to a sole arbitrator in arbitral proceedings before the Court of Arbitration for Sports (CAS) between a UAE-based company and a Qatari football club regarding performance of a commission agreement for the purchase of a football player. The applicable law is the Swiss law, the seat of arbitration is Lausanne (Switzerland), the applicable procedural rules are the 2018 CAS Code, and the amount in dispute is circa USD 0.5 million; Assistant to a sole arbitrator in arbitral proceedings before the Court of Arbitration for Sports (CAS) between a German football coach and a Chinese football club regarding performance of an employment contract. The applicable law is the law of Switzerland, the seat of arbitration is Lausanne (Switzerland), the applicable procedural rules are the 2019 CAS Code, and the amount in dispute is circa EUR 0.5 million.

BVI-incorporated company v. the Kyrgyz Republic, ad hoc investment arbitration regarding an investment in the country's largest telecom operator, London seat, applicable law is the Kyrgyz Foreign Investments Law, applicable arbitration rules are the 1976 UNCITRAL Rules of Arbitration, the amount in dispute is approx. USD 300 million; Turkish company v. the Republic of Kazakhstan, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/8 (including the ICSID annulment proceedings) regarding expropriation of an investment in the oil transhipment sector, applicable law is the Turkey-Kazakhstan BIT and the Energy Charter Treaty, applicable arbitration rules are the ICSID Arbitration Rules and the ICSID Convention, the amount in dispute is approx. USD 80 million; Public and private banks incorporated in the Islamic Republic of Iran v. Kingdom of Bahrain, ad hoc investment arbitration regarding an investment in the creation and operation of a commercial bank, Hague seat, applicable law is the 2002 Iran-Bahrain BIT, applicable arbitration rules are the 1976 UNCITRAL Rules of Arbitration, the amount in dispute is approx. USD 300 million; A Luxembourg national v. Turkey-, Belgium-, Netherlands- and Luxembourg-based group of companies, performance of a commercial representation agreement, Geneva seat, applicable law is the Swiss law, applicable arbitration rules are the SCAI Rules of Arbitration, the amount in dispute is approx. EUR 600 million; An Eastern European-based company v. an African State, implementation of several water supply and irrigation projects, Paris seat, applicable substantive law is the law of the respondent State, applicable arbitration rules are the 2012 ICC Rules of Arbitration, the amount in dispute is approx. USD 15 million; A Russian State-owned company v. a consortium of Italian companies, performance of a contract for the supply and installation of a telecommunication and signalling system for a railway, Vienna seat, applicable law is the Russian law, applicable arbitration rules are the 2013 VIAC Arbitration Rules, and the amount in dispute is approx. USD 40 million.

Co-author of the forthcoming Handbook on International Investment Law in the Russian language