Counsel, Co-head of international arbitration group
Russia
Experience as counsel
Acted as counsel more than 15 years in domestic and international arbitrations
ICAC Rules
LCIA Rules
ICC Rules
SCC Rules
Examples of cases
Representing a customer in ICAC at the RF CCI dispute with a contractor over payment for additional works claimed by the contractor following the construction of a plant’s logistics platform.
Representing a Russian geological company with the public shareholding in LCIA in a dispute with the equipment supplier.
Representing Rosatom Overseas in a dispute under the ICC Rules arising out of an EPC contract as related to construction of an atomic power station.
Representing a Russian contractor in an ICC dispute with its foreign counterparty in connection with the construction of a part of Nord Stream.
Representing a domestic group in a dispute under the ICC Rules in a subcontractor’s claim over the idle time charges due to construction of an atomic power station abroad.
Representing a domestic client in a dispute under the SCC Rules over the services of control over commissioning of the equipment.
quantum (damages) experts
construction experts
experts in specific equipment, experts on national laws (where applicable)
General arbitration experience
Moscow
London
Paris
Helsinki, Vienna
Russian law
English law
Swedish law
Swiss law
Finnish law, Czech law, UAE law
commodity arbitrations
сonstruction arbitrations
commercial arbitration
Corporate law arbitrations
Has been involved in expert determination as counsel
Durham University, LL.M., with distinction, 2006
Arbitration Centre at the RUIE (RSPP)
Education, qualifications, awards
Manchester University, LL.M, Honors: with distinction, 2005
Moscow State Law Academy, Specialist, Honors: with distinction, 2004
Legal500 (Dispute resolution: Litigation / Dispute resolution: arbitration and mediation)
Best Lawyers
Kommersant
Member of ICC Russia arbitration commission, member of the group on psychology in international arbitration
Preferences as an arbitrator
available
ICC and IBA guidelines
Fee rate based on the rules of a relevant arbitration institution. Not ready to waive costs.
no general preference
no general preference
no general preference
The schedule must be approved in advance by the parties and the tribunal taking consideration for the parties' preferences.
Yes
Maximum deference to the right to present the party’s case
9
Rigorous control of the process by the tribunal
Only if it is a legal issue the arbitrators may wish to have submissions on
It is only for parties to decide and arbitrators should focus on resolution of the dispute
