Chuprunov Ivan

Linklaters

ivan.chuprunov@linklaters.com

General information

Citizenship:

Russian Federation

City:

Moscow

Languages:

Russian - fluent

English - fluent

French - can read documents without translation

German - can read documents without translation

Career

2007 - 2021

Linklaters , Moscow

Managing Associate

Qualified to practice law in:

Russia

Experience as the tribunal’s secretary / assistant to the president of the tribunal

ICAC cases relating to (i) repayment of English law loan and (ii) payment under international sale of goods.

Experience as counsel

Acted as counsel for 5-10 years in international arbitrations

Arbitration Rules:

ICAC Rules

LCIA Rules

HKIAC Rules

Examples of cases

Representing clients in corporate disputes, including under SHA.

In 2 or more cases had direct responsibility for instructing and liaison with

quantum (damages) experts

General arbitration experience

Has been involved as councel in arbitration seated in:

Moscow

London

Has been involved as tribunal’s secretary in arbitration seated in:

Moscow

Has been involved in arbitrations where the applicable substantive law was:

Russian law

English law

Has been involved as counsel in:

commercial arbitration

Has been involved as tribunal’s secretary in:

commercial arbitration

Expert determination:

Has been involved in expert determination as counsel

Arbitration specific trainings/qualifications:

Education, qualifications, awards

Professional education:

Russian School of Private Law, Mag Jur, Honors: With honors, 2011

Moscow State University, Lawyer, Honors: With honors, 2009

Preferences as an arbitrator

Pre-appointment interview

available

Written submissions style

no general preference

Production of documents (general approach):

no general preference

Written submissions and bundles:

fully electronic

Allocation of time during an oral hearing:

Bockstiegel method (allocating an equal amount of time to each party with their freedom to use it as they wish between opening, examinations and closing)

Using PowerPoint in oral presentations:

no general preference

Party's right to present its case

Maximum deference to the right to present the party’s case

Rigorous control of the process by the tribunal

To what extent should arbitrators raise issues that have not been directly addressed by the relevant party but have been identified by the arbitrators

Only if it is a legal issue the arbitrators may wish to have submissions on

Approach to encouraging parties to amicably resolving dispute

It is only for parties to decide and arbitrators should focus on resolution of the dispute