Malinskaya Rimma

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

Address: Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Russia) LLP, Capital City Complex Moscow City Business Centre 8 Presnenskaya Nab. Bldg. 1 Moscow 123100

General information

Citizenship:

Russian Federation

City:

Moscow

Languages:

Russian - fluent

English - fluent

Career

2011 - 2021

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner , Moscow

Senior lawyer, Counsel

2011 - 2011

Hannes Snellman , Moscow

Associate

Qualified to practice law in:

Russia

Experience as counsel

Acted as counsel for 5-10 years in domestic and international arbitrations

Arbitration Rules:

ICAC Rules

LCIA Rules

Examples of cases

1. Russian bank v Cypriot guarantors, debt recovery under guarantees, London seat, LCIA Rules, English law, approx. USD 350 mln 2. Shareholders dispute in a Russian e-commerce company, claim for acquisition of the shares at a price determined by the tribunal, London seat, LCIA Rules, English law. 3. Disputes regarding breach of warranties and indemnities under sale of shares contract of a Russian insurance company, London seat, LCIA Rules, English law, approx. USD 13 mln 4. Several disputes between shareholders of a Russian bank related to M&A transaction, London seat, LCIA Rules, English law, approx. USD 300 mln. 5. Dispute between automotive sector companies for recovery of loss and penalty, ICAC Rules, Moscow seat, Russian law, approx. USD 1 mln. 6. Product supply dispute between food producer and its supplier under a supply contract, ICAC Rules, Moscow seat, Russian law, approx. USD 1 mln.

In 2 or more cases had direct responsibility for instructing and liaison with

Russian law

General arbitration experience

Has been involved as counsel in arbitration seated in:

Moscow

London

Has been involved in arbitrations where the applicable substantive law was:

Russian law

English law

Has been involved as counsel in:

commercial arbitration

Arbitration specific trainings/qualifications:

Education, qualifications, awards

Professional education:

Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University), Matsers degree, Honors: cum laude, 2003

Preferences as an arbitrator

Pre-appointment interview

available

Conflicts of interest: scope of disclosure

IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration

A preferable fee rate or structure / willingness to waive travel and other costs

Preferable fee rate to be communicated at request, no preferable fee structure.

Written submissions style

no general preference

Production of documents (general approach):

IBA Rules

Written submissions and bundles:

printed submission and electronic exhibits

Allocation of time during an oral hearing:

Bockstiegel method (allocating an equal amount of time to each party with their freedom to use it as they wish between opening, examinations and closing)

Using PowerPoint in oral presentations:

Yes

Party's right to present its case

Maximum deference to the right to present the party’s case

Rigorous control of the process by the tribunal

To what extent should arbitrators raise issues that have not been directly addressed by the relevant party but have been identified by the arbitrators

If it is a legal issue or an important factual issue

Approach to encouraging parties to amicably resolving dispute

It is only for parties to decide and arbitrators should focus on resolution of the dispute