Address: Osborne Clarke LLP, One London Wall, London EC2Y 5EB, England
General information
Russian Federation
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
London
Russian - fluent
English - fluent
Career
Osborne Clarke LLP
, London
Partner, International Arbitration
White & Case
, London
Counsel
White & Case
, London and Moscow
Senior Associate
SJ Berwin LLP
, London
Associate
SJ Berwin LLP
, London
Trainee Solicitor
United Kingdom
Experience as arbitrator
Served as arbitrator in more than 10 cases in international arbitrations
LCIA Rules
ICC Rules
SCC Rules
UNCITRAL Rules
ATAMEKEN
Examples of cases
Arbitration arising in connection with certain loans and guarantees relating to energy trading activities. LCIA rules, English law, one of three arbitrators.
Arbitration arising from failures relating to a major construction project. Stockholm rules, Belarussian law, Russian language, one of three arbitrators.
Ad-hoc arbitration regarding contract for the sale of shale oil. One of three arbitrators. English law.
Arbitration arising from claim by a Russian provider of certain services against its client from Kazakhstan, Russian law, place of arbitration in Nur-Sultan, ATAMEKEN arbitration rules, chairman of tribunal appointed by the co-arbitrators.
Arbitration arising from an investment in a technological business with the involvement of various parties from different jurisdictions, place of arbitration in London, English law, ICC rules, chairman of tribunal appointed by agreement of all parties.
No
Yes
Experience as counsel
Acted as counsel more than 15 years in international arbitrations
LCIA Rules
ICC Rules
SCC Rules
VIAC Rules
UNCITRAL Rules
ICSID Convention
Examples of cases
Over 20 years of experience representing parties in various arbitrations under different rules, with parties from different countries. Acting for corporations, UHNW individuals and countries. Main specialisation is on disputes with the seat of arbitration in London and/or with English applicable substantive law.
quantum (damages) experts
foreign law, various technical expertise
General arbitration experience
Moscow
London
Nur-sultan
Stockholm
London
Stockholm
Moscow
Russian law
Belarussian law
English law
commercial arbitration
investment arbitration
commercial arbitration
Has been involved in expert determination as counsel
Has been involved in mediation as party representative
CIArb – MCIArb or FCIArb or Chartered Arbitrator
ICC Advanced Arbitration Academy
CLF list of arbitrators - https://commerciallitigatorsforum.com/arbitrators/
Education, qualifications, awards
The College of Law, LPC, Postgraduate Diploma in Legal Practice, 2002
University College London, LL.B Laws with Advanced Studies, 2001
Recognised as a Global Leader in the Who's Who Legal: Arbitration 2020-2025 directory. Artem is identified as a Next Generation Partner and described as a "sharp-minded litigator" and as "very experienced in Russia and CIS-related arbitrations" in Legal500 UK 2020-2025.
Current:
Member of the LCIA court
Member of the LIDW board
Head of the SVAMC membership committee
Former:
ICC RUSSIA: Artem is a member of the ICC Commission on Arbitration and ADR representing ICC Russia. Artem is a member of the Nomination Committee of the Commission on International Arbitration of ICC Russia.
RAA: Artem is a member of the Board of the Russian Arbitration Association.
ARLA: Artem is a representative of the Anglo-Russian Law Association.
RCAN: Artem is a member of the executive committee of the Russia CIS Arbitration Network.
Artem is one of the founders of "RYUMKA".
a member of the London and Moscow committees of the Commercial Litigators' Forum ("CLF").
a member of the organising committee of the London International Disputes Week ("LIDW").
Preferences as an arbitrator
available
no general preference
IBA Rules
fully electronic
no general preference
Yes
Maximum deference to the right to present the party’s case
5
Rigorous control of the process by the tribunal
Only if it is a legal issue the arbitrators may wish to have submissions on
Arbitrators should encourage parties to settle the dispute including by making inquiries and/or steps such as encouraging participation of in-house counsel or management in hearings
