Andreev Dmitry Alekseyevich

Monastyrsky, Zyuba, Stepanov & Partners (MZS)

dmitry.a.andreev@gmail.com

General information

Citizenship:

Russian Federation

City:

Moscow

Languages:

Russian - fluent

English - fluent

Career

2010 - 2023

Monastyrsky, Zyuba, Stepanov & Partners (MZS) , Moscow

Counsel

2016 - 2016

Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP , London

Visiting Foreign Lawyer

Qualified to practice law in:

Russia

United Kingdom

United States (State of New York)

Experience as arbitrator

Served as arbitrator in 1-3 cases in domestic arbitrations

Arbitration Rules:

RAC Rules

Examples of cases

Dispute out of a sales contract, claim for recovery of liquidated damages, amount in dispute 4 million RUB, RAC Rules, Russian law, sole arbitrator. Dispute out of a services agreement, claim for recovery of liquidated damages, amount in dispute 2 million RUB, RAC Rules, Russian law, sole arbitrator.

Sat as sole arbitrator:

Yes

Sat as chair:

Experience as counsel

Acted as counsel for 11-15 years in domestic and international arbitrations

Arbitration Rules:

ICAC Rules

LCIA Rules

ICC Rules

SCC Rules

HKIAC Rules

VIAC Rules

UNCITRAL Rules

Examples of cases

Russian state corporation v CIS State, claim for recovery of compensation for expropriation of investments, Stockholm seat, international law, SCC Rules, approx. 2 billion USD. Cyprus investment companies v Russian banks, claim for reversal of the restructuring transaction involving replacement of loans with stock bonds, London seat, English & Russian law, LCIA Rules, approx. 650 million USD. Cyprus company v Cyprus company, claim for recovery of funds under a complex financial arrangement involving loans, share options and security collateral, Moscow seat, English law, ICAC Rules, approx. USD 50 million USD.

In 2 or more cases had direct responsibility for instructing and liaison with

quantum (damages) experts

law experts

General arbitration experience

Has been involved as arbitrator in arbitration seated in:

Moscow

Has been involved as councel in arbitration seated in:

Moscow

London

Paris

Stockholm

Hague

Vienna

Geneva and/or Zurich

Hong Kong

Has been involved in arbitrations where the applicable substantive law was:

Russian law

English law

Ukrainian law

Cyprus law

Has been involved as arbitrator in:

commercial arbitration

Has been involved as counsel in:

commercial arbitration

investment arbitration

commodity arbitrations

сonstruction arbitrations

Arbitration specific trainings/qualifications:

LL.M in Dispute Resolution (Certificate in International Commercial Arbitration)

Education, qualifications, awards

Professional education:

Pepperdine University, LL.M. in Dispute Resolution, 2015

MGIMO University, Master of Laws, Honors: with distinction, 2012

MGIMO University, Bachelor of Laws, Honors: with distinction, 2010

Positions (current and former) in arbitration community bodies / working groups / as law professor

Co-chair of Young International Modern Arbitration, chair of the committee for interaction between arbitration and state courts Associate professor at MGIMO-University

Preferences as an arbitrator

Pre-appointment interview

available

Conflicts of interest: scope of disclosure

IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration RCCI Rules on impartiality and independence of arbitrators

Written submissions style

no general preference

Production of documents (general approach):

no general preference

Written submissions and bundles:

fully electronic

Allocation of time during an oral hearing:

no general preference

Using PowerPoint in oral presentations:

no general preference

Party's right to present its case

Maximum deference to the right to present the party’s case

Rigorous control of the process by the tribunal

To what extent should arbitrators raise issues that have not been directly addressed by the relevant party but have been identified by the arbitrators

Always

Approach to encouraging parties to amicably resolving dispute

Arbitrators should encourage parties to settle the dispute including by making inquiries and/or steps such as encouraging participation of in-house counsel / management in hearings